emuu.net
opinions and images by m. werneburg since 1998
adventures · creations · articles · photo · journal · about me

obtaining pr status for your spouse in Canada

by m. werneburg, 2011.04.06

I am Canadian, from a family that can trace its Canadian roots to well before Confederation. My wife is Japanese. Our young son is both. When we recently moved to Canada, I assumed that it would be a simple matter to obtain resident status for my wife.

I was wrong. Filing for permanent residence for my wife turned out to be difficult and stressful. The requirements are demanding; the forms are obtuse; the process is opaque; and the wait times are insane. Behind it all is a fundamentally flawed approach by the government that treats spousal visa applications as an attempt to bring people into the country through marriages of convenience. Guilty until proven innocent. And throughout whatever is to come, my wife's in a waiting game: unable to work; unable to secure health coverage; and unable to leave the country.

where to start?

Right from the outset, it was hard to get a clear picture on the process involved, and which of the avenues we should pursue. After my first sally into this arena, I was not even sure what the objective was: some sort of spoudal visa? Permanent residence? Citizenship? Nor did I understand the starting point in all of this.

Like everyone else starting the process from Japan, I had available to me several sources:

  • the visa office at the Canadian embassy in Tokyo
  • the website of the Canadian embassy in Tokyo
  • the official Citizenship and Immigration Canada website
  • the forms and guides available for download
  • the staff at the CIC call centre

These tended to contradict each other. The forms to be filled in particular seemed not to jibe with the stated goals on the website(s). Eventually, though, some points emerged.

  • Unlike the Japanese process by which I'd obtained residence in Japan, there was no "spousal visa"; the goal of the family-class immigration process is permanent residence, embodied in a "permanent resident's card".
  • Obtaining P.R. status for my wife would entail both sponsoring her and vowing to support her financially.
  • There are two processes by which to sponsor your spouse, the so called "inland" and "outland" processes designed for spouses living in-Canada and outside Canada. Some of the differences are spelled out here.
  • To qualify, my wife would require both a health exam and a criminal check done in Canada.

So far, so good. So, too, was the surest route for a Canadian to secure their spouse's sponsorship. I'd have to demonstrate the ability to support my sponsored family financially: I'd need a job in Canada.

our strategy

Being Canadian, I had several insights that helped.

Naturally, applying from outside the country without a job lined up in Canada was a non-starter. Canada's not an easy place to find work if you don't have recent in-country experience, and as many job-searchers here will tell you, it's nearly impossible to get a response from a would-be employer if you're applying from a remote location. As an example, I'm currently assisting someone at my office in downtown Toronto to fill a job position: the hiring manager won't even consider applicants from as "far away" as the Toronto suburbs of Brampton or Burlington!

Obviously, it made much more sense for me to first find work in Canada. Having a job in a city means moving to that city, so the order of operations was clear:

  1. get to Toronto
  2. find a job
  3. bring Mari and our son
  4. find a home
  5. start the application for Mari's P.R.

This meant hinging our success on splitting up for an extended period. And so it was that I left my family on the other side of the globe and took my chances on Toronto's job market. Thanks to my networking in advance, this went well and I landed a job well before I had to return to Canada.

The move to the country went well enough, too. Japanese citizens don't need a visa to enter Canada. We just had to be sure to mention that we had goods that were coming separately.

Finding a home took a full month of course. Doing so in deep snow and sub-zero temperatures wasn't a joy, but we found a place that suited us.

At last we could turn our attentions to the P.R. application.

completing the application

The first 'gotcha' came when the police check back in Japan took nearly two months. If we'd done that portion before leaving Japan, it would have been a ten-day process. Doing so remotely added four-six unexplained weeks to the process.

The whole application hinged on that must-have portion being complete, so we put off the health-check (one of the costs in the process, at $175) and concentrated on the forms.

The forms, as noted above, contradicted the advice I'd had from the various humans I'd spoken to. In fact, they ran strongly against the concept of a Canadian applying to bring his spouse to the country. They are, instead, geared at foreigner-born Canadian "A" proving that he doesn't have other spouses--past or present, either inside Canada or not--while bringing foreigner "B" to the country. There was, for instance, no way in the forms to indicate that as a sponsor I was Canadian from birth. There was also no clear way short of an external letter attached to the applicable form to indicate that our son is already a Canadian citizen. The focus seemed to be "how many children (by parents other than you) is your sponsored spouse bringing to the country?" Again and again, we were asked things like 'who arranged our marriage', 'does your family know about this marriage', and even 'has your spouse met your children'.

As a result, I decided not to simply try to squeeze a meaningful impression of our marriage into the many small boxes on the forms. First I wrote a succinct history of our relationship from the time we met through to the present. This covered our first meetings with each other's families, the birth of our son (what more proof do we need that we're a real couple), the reasons we left Japan (the 2008 financial meltdown was a major factor, as job opportunities in Japan had dried up), vacations we'd taken together, and even our current life together in Canada. I peppered this telling of our history with photos, and attached separate prints of those same photos.

I then supplied a barrage of letters in support of the validity of our marriage, from such sources as:

  • good friends in Tokyo who knew Mari and me and could write in English
  • my recent business partner
  • the bank, stating that we had a joint account
  • an uncle who'd spent his career with the Department of Citizenship and Immigration
  • the Canadian embassy in Tokyo itself, where I'd served as a warden in the Consular division's emergency response program
  • our landlord in Toronto
  • the accountant for our (defunct) business in Tokyo
  • my current employer in Canada

I can't claim responsibility for the concept of this history and the letters. These ideas I got from a forum that's an excellent resource for people immigrating to Canada: CanadaVisa.com's forum.

As a Canadian citizen, I can understand why the forms are structured to weed out false marriages of convenience. But what I don't appreciate is that the process(es) are as opaque and error-prone as they are. I simply don't know what to expect, having filed the application this morning. I've read so many bewildering stories of legitimate couples who wound up struggling and even withdrawing their attempts at moving to Canada that I don't have a lot of confidence that things will go smoothly.

dangers

The hazards for a legitimate spousal sponsorship are two-fold. First, the seemingly-sensible "inland" process is a molasses-slow disaster. An applicant can expect two months to go by before their application is even opened! The first portion of this application process, the approval of the sponsor (a Canadian citizen) takes, in total, ten months. That's up from about six months only a few years ago. The second process, the approval of the sponsored spouse, takes an amount of time that can't be guessed in advance but seems guaranteed to take between eight months and twenty months. And that's on top of the first ten month period. During this entire process, there's no guarantee that the sponsored spouse can ever obtain the right to work, have health care, or even obtain a driver's license. They can't even leave the country while they're waiting. Having one spouse living on hold while months turn into years of waiting seems unacceptable on several counts. The family involved has to live on hold. Meanwhile Canada can't make the most of the sponsored spouse's residence in the country: they can't work; they can't pay tax; they can't take subsidized (and therefore affordable) courses. And if the interminable process fails, it can't be repeated: there's no appeal and no repeat application.

The second hazard is that the "outland" process can require us to make trips back to Japan at arbitrary times for an interview. This is an expense that we'll just have to face when and if it comes up, but the visa offices have been known to repeatedly set and then cancel appointments. And then there's the Catch-22/Kafkaeaque component: if we leave the country during an application it's entirely possible that our departure will sabotage the application. It seems that immigrations officers take it upon themselves to occasionally reject applicants coming and going from the country even when they have visa-free status (e.g. from another wealthy country such as Japan or the UK). But we've decided to chance it, and have settled on the "outland" process as the only sensible one. Better to run into a potential problem with an IO than sign up for a two year crap-shoot!

final word

The process has cost us $1400 so far, mostly in fees for the application's processing.

As mentioned, the forms are tricky. As "fillable" PDF's they fail because the actual fields in the PDF's are in places read-only and not "visible". But more importantly, they and the guides are grossly under-explained and the scant explanations often don't jibe with what's going on in the forms. In the coming days, I'll add to this page an explanation of some of the error-prone bits of the immigration forms to help anyone else going through the process.

tips on getting a Canadian spousal PR

This is a collection of important notes that I picked up while going through the process of obtaining my wife's permanent residency in Canada.

Tokyo photo book

photo of the day

what's new

tools

rand()m quote

I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end.
-Douglas Adams

recommended

copyright

Creative Commons License
streets without names
reader comments
gravatar for Gixxstar
Hey, My Girlfriend and I are in a similar situation with the visa, we are going to get married and just wondering what is the best route. It seems that the "outland" option is best, however she is worried that if she needs to fly home for a family emergency it could effect the application. Also, am I right in thinking that we could her PR in about 6-12months plus the time it takes to process the marriage certificate etc?
Gixxstar
2011.09.26
The "outland" option is by far the best. Depending on her country of origin, the entire thing could be wrapped up in well under four months (I've witnessed this for people coming from the UK and Austria, for instance). You can also reapply through the outland route if your application fails or if you withdraw. Note that if you leave the country during the outland route there's a good chance that you'll get back in if you simply present yourselves and have a copy of your PR application in hand. That's what my wife did this summer when she returned to see her grandmother, who's not well. We took a chance, though, because it was up to the whim of the individual immigration officer. Do not be fooled, Canada's system is not as flexible and encouraging as its critics would have you believe.

The "inland" process was a more recent addition to the government's policies, and it was created to allow people who'd been living in Canada illegally with a means of landing. It takes about two years. And during that time you absolutely cannot leave the country. Moreover, it's a one-shot thing—if you withdraw your application or it fails for some reason, you can't apply again.

I suggest you join this forum and find some useful threads or start your own:
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/family-class-sponsorship-b5.0/

My other advice:
1. Decide if you can really put up with months and months of waiting in limbo. If she's going to live with you in Canada she will be unable to
-Michael
gravatar for Ponce
Going through the same crap. Canadian perm/res sucks.
Ponce
2012.03.03
It does indeed. Good luck with your long wait. (P.S. Did you apply inland or outland?)
-Michael
gravatar for Marie
I will be in that situation. I need to know the route to follow. I reside now in the US going to school. My fiancee lives in the UK and we are planning to move to Canada. He is a UK citizen and I am Canadian. Where I start?
Marie
2012.03.19
Hello, Marie; You can start with this unofficial immigration wiki: http://immipedia.ca It's been put together by people who have been through the experience. My strongest advice is: 1. Follow the so-called "outland" procedure, some guidance from the gov't is here: http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/applications/famcls.asp And here are the forms. http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/applications/fc.asp (Your v.o. is London, not Buffalo.) 2. Start gathering proof of your relationship such as emails, photos of you together, photos of you with each other's family and friends, records of how you came to be engaged and where you have been seen in public together, if you own any property together, if you have any children together. Start gathering letters of reference (it's better if they're prominent people) in support of your relationship's validity (e.g. we even supplied one from our landlady). It would be best if you can show that you have a job in Canada. 3. Wait. A lot. The current government is not supportive of this entire process, and wait times have been escalating. The whole thing took us from January to October, and we were relatively lucky (e.g. note that several people who applied in April of 2011 still haven't gotten anywhere: https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?hl=en&hl=en&key=0AsXgiZGqzRb8dFhYVUxqYzRrU0hvemVGaDFoSEhKVFE&output=html
-Michael
comment
name
email
website